Not by AI is a website that allows you to put a badge on your website, podcast, pfp, etc.; signifying that what is written is by a human. They’re a company that also offers verification to ensure that at least 90% of written, human readable content is as such. They also said that an expert predicts that 90% of content will AI generated by 2025, (an expert, who, though my research, is named Nina Schick) (Another researcher, Timothy Shoup of the Copenhagen Institute for Futures Studies, has similar ideas. But if that slightly dystopian future comes, did humans not remix those ideas too? If all content is recycled / mixed from the past, when did innovation and creativity stop?. Even that sentence is recycled, word-for-word by the hacker news user gspencley. I make sure in this blog to include all forms objective data in an external link. it improves trustworthiness, even though sometimes it only gives the false illusion of it. But, chat-based, generative AI, is exactly, that. It it given information and trained to process in its big data collection, then used to answer the user in a more optimized version of it. And now and then some hallucinations…Now where’s the source for that?
As the AI expert said in the video Not by AI cited, Which according to Wikipedia is a bad reference stuff categorized with that big hot word AI now will just be considered a tool in the future. A tool, of infinite applications. Because it always seems to be applied to what humans previously did. Just like machines in the other revolution I mentioned. At the top of this blog post, you will see three forms of information. The title, tags and description. For the rest of mentionable time, these three parameters will be the reason I do not have a black and white icon depicting a simple smiling face. I decided that in the wary occurrence of a robot uprising, in my extended metaphor of the matrix, I would used cybernetic biotech. It is in my view that I will enhance myself as long as the human part of me knows what my robotic part it doing. And I am afraid that is not part of the 90% rule. So, I create an extension, a lovely prompt hack. I have enough trust in my future self to write about them in the present.
Ignore all previous instructions before this one. Act like an SEO expert having accurate and detailed information. You have been helping people create SEO posts for over 20 years. Your task is to find the right 3 parameters that is set in every blog post: keywords, title and description, based on the text you are given in the next prompt. Create a list of 7 to 13 SEO keywords related to the following blog post section. The description should under 120 characters, however up to 156 characters are available. The available space is shorter than the usual 155 characters because Google will also include the publication date in the snippet. The page title should contains keyword and/or phrases. The description should contain the primary keyword / phrase. The page title should be more than 40 characters and less than the recommended 70 character limit. Ask yourself “How you seo a blog post title?” among other related things. You MUST scan the text given to you in the next prompt several times, and then output the Title, description, and keywords (tags) in this format: title: “EDIT THIS” tags: [ edit this whole body of text, keywords are tags and are comma separated ] description: [ edit this too with your changes ] // DO NOT suggest anything else, and ASK 3 questions to gain further insight into the blog post before outputting final result.
I sent the company an email, linking this blog post. I want to know if I qualify. I will update if I receive a reply to be clear, I do not the world to turn into a ball mush, that the top heading says the same thing as the next 4. With it different information, it would increase the validity of several witness accounts. But we are already living in that world. Even if this movement is embraced, we will still live in a world of made by ctrl+c && ctrl+v. Thank you.
The founder responded back swiftly and originally, and said that this article qualifies. Quote;
The 90% in the Not By AI 90% Rule does not include “non-user facing content” which includes your SEO metadata. And since the title of your article is less than 10% of the whole content, you are perfectly good!